Cincinnati Enquirer Cites Federal Crime Committed by Jean Schmidt in Endorsement

Forest Park, Ohio

Ohio Second Congressional District independent write-in candidate Nate Noy today continued on the path of his anti-corruption campaign trail by informing the public that Jean Schmidt has committed a federal crime, Noy stated: "The incompetence and/or dishonesty of the Cincinnati Enquirer continued to shine through today when it endorsed Jean Schmidt for Congress and cited a federal crime committed by her as one of her major accomplishments."

Noy added the following facts: "In its endorsement the Enquirer stated: 'She won high marks for helping to deal with the styrene leak in eastern Cincinnati shortly after she took office.' This stems from a letter she sent to the administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration on August 29, 2005. A copy of the letter was still posted on the Jean Schmidt website today at: http://news.enquirer.com/assets/AB7777830.PDF ."

"The LAW is very clear and Jean Schmidt broke it when she wrote this letter. There is federal legislation that limits the use of the Franking Privilege to sitting members of Congress. There is a provision that allows for a member-elect to utilize this Privilege if and only if the following three prongs are met: (1) The letter must be in responses to a letter; (2) the member-elect must be certified by the Board of Elections and (3) the member-elect must have prior approval from the U.S. House."

"This letter was written BEFORE Jean Schmidt went to Congress and long before Secretary of State Ken Blackwell certified her election results. If you recall it was mid-November before the Hamilton County Board of Elections certified the special election of August 2005. Schmidt signed this letter 'Congresswoman-elect' but legally she was NOT certified and therefore she could NOT legally send the letter."

Noy added: "Another ironic twist in this tale is the fact that this letter is posted on Jean Schmidt's CAMPAIGN WEBSITE! U.S. House rules clearly prohibit the use of any official correspondence on a campaign website. So even IF Schmidt found a way to circumvent the law when she first sent this letter the fact that she is using it in her campaign is another violation of the law. If does not surprise me that the same newspaper that endorsed a woman that does not even recall what kind of college degree she has by citing her 'file-card memory' last year would point to another blatant illegal act by Jean Schmidt when endorsing her this year. How much stock does this woman own in the company? Or perhaps the Cincinnati Enquirer simply employs the most incompetent editors on the planet!"

For more information regarding Noy’s findings please contact the Nate Noy for Congress Committee campaign headquarters at 513-259-7782 or admin@noyforcongress.com.

-30-

More Proof Jean Schmidt is a Liberal

By Nate Noy


Let's look at the facts:

Jean Schmidt: voted to raise the minimum wage and has taken "Into to Econ" four times.
Nate Noy: has an MBA and BA in Econ and understands the dire consequences on the economy of raising the minimum wage and vows to NEVER vote for a raise in this government imposed price floor.

Jean Schmidt: voted to BAN GUNS in Clermont County.
Nate Noy: believes in the importance of the 2nd Amendment and will fight to repeal current gun legislation.

Jean Schmidt: voted for the highest tax in crease in Ohio history when she was a State Rep (including a gas tax increase.)
Nate Noy: is a supply-side economist that prescribes to Reaganomics and will NEVER vote to increase taxes.

Jean Schmidt: has flip-flopped on right to life issues.
Nate Noy: is 100% Pro-Life.

Jean Schmidt: supports bringing a radioactive waste dump to Piketon, Ohio in OH-2.
Nate Noy: is FROM Piketon, Ohio and has vowed to do whatever it takes to keep the dump out of his backyard.

Jean Schmidt: took an illegal lobbyist funded trip to Cuba and supports lifting the embargo.
Nate Noy: supports the trade embargo and will NEVER support a communist regime.

Jean Schmidt: lied about her FAKE college degree and was reprimanded for a "reckless disregard for truth" and making "false and misleading statements" by the Ohio Elections Commission.
Nate Noy: has three degrees that he earned and a clean record.

Jean Schmidt: voted to support the GOP agenda 98% of time.
Nate Noy: supports the GOP platform in general but realizes that sometimes the national agenda is NOT the best thing for Ohio-2, and the role of a Rep is to support the people of the home District first and foremost. It's about Ohio-2!

Jean Schmidt is a Psychopath

By Nate Noy

Last night at the Clermont County League of Women Voters event I shared some facts with the audience:

(1) That Jean Schmidt was publicly reprimanded by the OEC in April for a "reckless disregard for truth" and making "false and misleading statements" for lying about her FAKE college degree.

(2) That she went on the TV 12 Newsmakers show with Dan Hurley the day after her reprimand and blamed this lie on her web developers.

(3) That on November 2, 1989 when Jean first ran for a public office that she claimed "two college degrees."

(4) That unless Jean shared the same web developer as Al Gore in 1989 this is impossible.

After the event someone came up to me and shared their own Jean Schmidt story. I was told that a few years back Jean came to speak at a community college and told the students that she had "worked her way through college by cleaning houses."

Jean is the daughter of a multi-millionaire she has NEVER cleaned a house in her life.

Jean is known as "Mean Jean" because of the way she treats others, and she has been caught in lie, after lie, after lie. She has NEVER said "I'm sorry" for any of her lies and she continues to lie on a daily basis.

Some people believe she is simply a pathological liar. However, I'm pretty sure that any FBI profiler would label her "psychotic."

I am NOT a MD or a Ph. D. (I only have a BA in Econ, JD and MBA). However, I have spent some time looking at the subject of neurology and I believe Jean Schmidt suffers from antisocial personality disorder (APD).

According to Wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder

Diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV-TR)
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a widely used manual for diagnosing mental and behavioral disorders, defines antisocial personality disorder as a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since age 15, as indicated by three (or more) of the following:

failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
reckless disregard for safety of self or others
consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain steady work or honor financial obligations
lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another

Sound like Jean Schmidt to you? Sure does to me!

Mnemonic
A mnemonic that can be used to remember the criteria for antisocial personality disorder is CORRUPT[1][2]:

C - cannot follow law
O - obligations ignored
R - remorselessness
R - recklessness
U - underhandedness
P - planning deficit
T - temper
Yep, still SOUNDS LIKE JEAN SCHMIDT!!!!!!


Folks, let's do Jean and everyone in OH-2 a favor on November 7, 2006. If you are a liberal then Vote for Vic Wulsin. If you share my conservative values then write-in Nate Noy for Congress. Let's send Jean Schmidt home! Since she has all of the money in the world she should be able to get treatment from doctors ASAP.

I for one will actually be praying for JEAN. I hope she gets the professional help she clearly needs.

Nate

Nate Noy's Position on the Issues

By Nate Noy


Unlike Jean Schmidt and Victoria Wulsin I am willing to go on the record with my position on every critical issue facing our nation today.

In addition I am willing to report ALL of my time to the People if elected, as noted in my signing of the Punch Clock agreement of the Sunlight Foundation.

If you want to know where I stand, simply click on each of the imbedded links.

Nate

WCPO Interview

NPAT - Abortion, Taxes, Government Spending, Iraq, etc.

Community Values

Health Care

Nate's Signed Commitment to Transparency!

Why NOT to vote for Nate

Nate Noy Lodges Formal FCC Complaint Against WKRC

By Nate Noy

Below is a copy of my formal FCC request and response I sent to legal counsel for WKRC. The big boys have picked the proverbial wrong little guy to mess with this time.

Nate

FCC Letter

Dear Ms. Cooper,

My name is Nathan Noy and I am a Federal Candidate for the U.S. House in the Second Congressional District of Ohio. I am writing you to lodge a formal complaint against WKRC Television 12 in Cincinnati, Ohio for a willful violation of 47 USC Section 315.

Facts
My FEC # is: H6OH02268. I am registered as an Independent and I am endorsed by the Reform Party and America First Party.
I am certified as a write-in candidate by the Board of Elections.
I have taken part in all local League of Women Voters candidate's forums and debates as well as other forums in the District.
I was given proper FCC access to interview opportunities by Channel 19 and Channel 9 TV and 700 and 1050 Radio.

Complaint
At 11:00am EDT on 10/15/06 WKRC Channel 12 aired a debate between Jean Schmidt and Victoria Wulsin the two major party candidates on its Newsmakers program. I was willfully denied an opportunity to take part in this event and Channel 12 was on ample notice of my candidacy given they had previously interviewed me as part of another elections coverage event.

The debate in question was one in a series of Congressional debates that not only were aired by WKRC but also were actually sponsored by the station.

I have attempted to negotiate a fair alternative settlement with the station to provide me with fair access per 47 USC Section 315; however talks with legal counsel for WKRC have reached an impasse.

Given the above I am requesting that the FCC enforce 47 USC Section 315 and that the FCC forces the station to conduct a special taping and airing of the Channel 12 Newsmakers program that MUST air prior to the election with a similar audience reach per the code. Alternatively, I request that the FCC enforce the penalty provisions of 47 USC Section 317 and revoke the WKRC license to broadcast.

Legal counsel for WKRC maintains a legal position that this illegal act falls within the exceptions of the code.

The key distinction between the legal argument presented to me by counsel for WKRC and this specific issue is that Channel 12 scheduled and sponsored a series of debates for ALL Congressional candidates and willfully excluded me. There is NO bona fide "news story" here, the "campaign" is THE news story. The legislative intent of the code is very clear and I believe there is NO exception for WKRC here.

If WKRC does not comply with the above request prior to the November 7, 2006 election I am formally requesting that the FCC revoke their license. Please advise as to the proper process that must be followed to bring this issue to fruition. I am fully prepared to enter into the Federal Court System if resolution of this issue requires such and I will obtain legal counsel of my own to achieve this end if necessary.

Please advise as how to properly proceed.

Regards,
Nate Noy
513-259-7782

Letter to WKRC Legal Team

Mr. Coy:

While I respect your legal analysis of this issue I disagree with you on the issue raised by this point of law and the legislative intent behind 47 USC Section 315.

Therefore, I intend to file a formal complaint with the FCC and request revocation of the WKRC FCC license.

My previous correspondence to WKRC was meant to be seen as a viable workaround for the station. I am now requesting a special taping and airing of the Channel 12 Newsmakers program that MUST air prior to the election.

The key distinction between the cases you cited and this specific issue is that Channel 12 scheduled and sponsored a series of debates for ALL Congressional candidates and willfully excluded me. There is NO bona fide "news story" here, the "campaign" is THE news story. The legislative intent of the code is very clear and I believe there is NO exception for WKRC here. Therefore, unless WKRC schedules a special episode of Newsmakers, preempts other programming and airs this with a similar audience reach I will pursue this FCC complaint to its final and complete resolution by the FCC and the federal court system. If WKRC prefers to pay your firm 100X more for legal fees then it would have lost in revenue by accepting my previous offer then I guess they simply do not understand the theory of a cost-benefit analysis.

I have been contacted by members of the Green Party and other interested parties for this case. Our goal will be for the FCC and the Courts to sanction WKRC by revoking its license to broadcast. This will be a watershed case in our opinion and we believe it will serve as a strong precedent for future actions by other FCC licensed entities.

I wish you the best in this fight. However, I believe as long as the courts follow the letter of the law and the legislative intent of the code in this matter there is little question that our side will prevail and WKRC will have made one of the poorest business decisions in the history of broadcasting.

Regards,

Nate Noy

Ohio-2 Congressional Candidate's Debates and Forums Schedule

10/24 6:00pm Clermont County League of Women Voters - CANDIDATES’ & ISSUES’ NIGHT ($20 for non-members, call Brenda Johnson at 513-576-5264 for info.)

Nate Noy- Confirmed
Victoria Wulsin - Confirmed
Jean Schmidt - "She is a member of the league and we expect her to be there" per the organizers of the event.

10/27 3:00pm Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community - 3550 Shaw Cincinnati, OH 45208 Candidates Forum.

Nate Noy- Confirmed
Victoria Wulsin - Confirmed
Jean Schmidt - "She has no interest in sharing her views with members of the retirement community."

11/1 (Time TBA) Melvin Dean's Candidate's Forum event at Grant Vo Tech on Route 125 near Bethel, Ohio. Call Melvin Dean for additional information at 513-734-2833.

Nate Noy- Confirmed
Victoria Wulsin - Confirmed
Jean Schmidt - "I was the ONLY one to get Jean to debate Bob McEwen in the primary. I am 90% sure of her attendance at this event" per Melvin Dean.

11/4 New Hope Baptist Church Candidate's Forum - event details TBA.

Nate Noy- Confirmed
Victoria Wulsin - Unknown
Jean Schmidt - "She has no interest in addressing the concerns of the Christian community. Anyone convicted of lying about a fake college degree by the Ohio Elections Commission clearly has a low set of moral standards, we will be praying for her."

10 Reasons Jean Schmidt is NOT a REAL Republican

By Nate Noy

(1) Her fake college degree and the subsequent public reprimand she received from the Ohio Elections Commission for a "reckless disregard for truth" and making "false and misleading statements."

(2) Her lie on TV that a "web developer" was responsible for her fake college degree given the proof that she first lied about the degree on November 2, 1989 in the Clermont Sun newspaper.

(3) Her ties to Larry Householder. The fact that Householder recruited her to run as for State Rep on the "Householder platform."

(4) Her ties to Bob Tax including the fact that she chaired the Taft for Secretary of State and Taft for Governor campaigns.

(5) Her votes to raise taxes in Ohio and the subsequent destruction of Ohio's economy because of her votes.

(6) Her vote to BAN GUNS.

(7) Her lack of respect and violation of the House Ethics Rules when she called a war hero a "coward" on the House Floor.

(8) Her support of the Castro communist regime.

(9) Her elitist attitude towards the common people.

(10) Her sworn testimony that she "does not know" what kind of college degree she has.


The list goes on and on and on. If the Republican Party is to ever purify itself it MUST purge RINO's like Jean Schmidt.

Nate

Nate Noy Ahead in Ohio-2 Vote Count

Politics Extra: More Esquire magazine endorsements

Nate Noy Ahead in Ohio-2 Vote Count

By Nate Noy

Yesterday the folks at the Survey USA poll released an updated poll showing 48% of likely voters currently behind Jean Schmidt, 40% with Vic Wulsin and 12% either with me, Nate Noy, or undecided. Various media outlets and blogs reported these results with the headline “Jean Schmidt ahead 8 points in OH-2 or Jean Schmidt winning.”

There is a serious fallacy in the above headlines. Here is why:

(1) What 500 or so voters would do if the election were held on October 17 is hardly a valid indicator of what 200,000 voters will likely do in three weeks. A lot can and WILL change between now and November 7.
(2) 77% of the voters in this district are Independent! The poll only uses a fraction of these likely voters in its results.
(3) We are not even sure where these 500 people live. A valid poll should represent 77% independent voters with a consistent breakdown by county. About 20% of the voters reside in the rural counties, my guess is Survey USA did not venture outside of the 513 area code when they conducted their poll. If this poll were conducted in Loveland, Ohio (Jean’s hometown) then one would expect her to be winning, if it were conducted in Piketon, Ohio then Nate Noy would have 80% of the vote.

The only way a candidate is “winning” this race is if ballots have already been cast. I personally know a number of people that have already voted absentee, and they have ALL already voted for ME, NOT Vic or Jean.

Additionally there are still at least four major candidate forum events that will take place between now and November 7. Factor in the various television interviews that have yet to air and what I’m about to say makes perfect logical sense.

Our internal polling shows in excess of 70% of the voters in OH-2 are undecided. That’s right 70%. A lot will happen between now and November 7, and one thing I’m certain of is that no candidate has secured enough votes as of today to be considered “winning” this election.

You WILL NOT see the media report a 70% undecided number. Why is that you ask? Because 70% undecided does not sell newspapers or get viewers to watch the nightly news. However, it is the truth! Something the media loves to overlook this time of year.


Nate

Nate Noy “Outs” Vic Wulsin; “Compliments” Jean Schmidt at LWV Event

Portsmouth, Ohio

The Scioto County League of Women Voters conducted its annual Meet the Candidates Night on Monday in Portsmouth Ohio. The event included various candidates from the Scioto County area but only one candidate for the Second Congressional District race for the U.S. House of Representatives actually bothered to attend. Independent write-in candidate Nate Noy took full advantage of the decision by Victoria Wulsin and Jean Schmidt to continue to ignore the rural region of Ohio-2.

Noy’s presentation included why voters should NOT vote for him. Additionally Noy provided the conservative Christian audience (which included a radio coverage) evidence that Victoria Wulsin appeared at a Gay Pride Parade last year and advocates bringing abortions to Africa as a form of birth control. Noy stated: "I’ve known all along that Victoria Wulsin is a ‘San Francisco Democrat’ she is a very progressive liberal. I previously had a deal in place with her staff to debate and I promised NOT to expose her for what she really is. Since she opted to pull a page from the Jean Schmidt school of campaigning and ‘cut and run’ from my debates with her I warned her staff that this would happen and I will continue to assure the voters of Ohio know her for what she really is."

Noy added: “One of the questions presented to the entire group was to ‘provide a compliment toward your opponent.’ My compliment of Jean Schmidt drew a roar of laughter from the crowd. I complimented Jean for ‘doing what she is told.’ I illustrated how when Jean Schmidt was told to vote for a gun ban in Miami Township, she voted for a gun ban. When she was part of the corrupt Larry Householder and Bob Tax regime as a State Rep and told to vote for the highest tax increase in Ohio history she obliged without a second thought. And when she was told to call a war hero and 37-year member of the Marine Corps a ‘coward’ on the House Floor she again did exactly as she was told. One thing I will say for Jean Schmidt: she does what she is told without a second thought.”

Noy concluded: “The issues I pointed out regarding Wulsin and Schmidt are obvious. This District needs a conservative that thinks for himself. NOT some puppet of a Party or someone that believes in special rights for homosexuals and advocates the utilization of abortion as a form of birth control. It’s about Ohio-2.”

For more information regarding Noy’s findings please contact the Nate Noy for Congress Committee campaign headquarters at 513-259-7782 or admin@noyforcongress.com.

-30-

WKRC Channel 12 Could Lose FCC License by airing Schmidt-Wulsin Debate

Politics Extra: The one, the only Schmidt-Wulsin debate!

WKRC Channel 12 Could Lose FCC License by airing Schmidt-Wulsin Debate

Piketon, Ohio

Ohio Second Congressional District independent write-in candidate Nate Noy today continued on the path of his anti-corruption campaign trail by announcing that WKRC Channel 12 has violated Title 47 of the United States Code section 315 and that he intends to pursue an immediate legal action against the station unless the issue is immediately rectified.

Noy who holds a JD stated: “ The Communications Act of 1934 as amended in Title 47 of the USC is very explicit in section 315: ‘If any licensee shall permit any person who is a legally qualified candidate for any public office to use a broadcasting station, he shall afford equal opportunities to all other such candidates for that office in the use of such broadcasting station.’ By airing this debate without me Channel 12 has subjected itself to section 312 of the code administrative sanctions.”

Link to CODE.

Section 312 of the code states: “The Commission may revoke any station license or construction permit for willful or repeated failure to allow reasonable access to or to permit purchase of reasonable amounts of time for the use of a broadcasting station, other than a non-commercial educational broadcast station, by a legally qualified candidate for Federal elective office on behalf of his candidacy.”

Noy added: “I will attempt to negotiate an alternative settlement with Channel 12 however the code and the subsequent Becker case make this an iron-clad rule. The teeth that the penalty carries in this type of case under the code have some very serious bite, in fact in addition to a potential $1,000,000 fine I could actually end up with Channel 12’s license to broadcast.”

In closing Noy added: “The law is the law. Some in the media may believe they can take my anti-corruption campaign lightly. However, they have picked the proverbial wrong little guy to mess with this time. I will see this issue through no matter the cost. And this should put others on clear notice that if they even consider breaking the law in their elections coverage that they will be next on my list.”

For more information regarding Noy’s findings please contact the Nate Noy for Congress Committee campaign headquarters at 513-259-7782 or admin@noyforcongress.com.

-30-

Cincinnati Enquirer: Too Lazy; Too Incompetent; or Too Dishonest?

By Nate Noy

Fact: On July 31, 2005 the Cincinnati Enquirer endorsed Jean Schmidt for Congress and cited her "file card memory" as one of the primary reasons for giving her an endorsement.

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050731/EDIT03/507310314/1023/EDIT

Fact: In April of this year Jean Schmidt gave sworn testimony (which is a matter of public record) that she does not remember what most people would consider significant events in her life such as: the kind of college degree she has; what years she attended college; and the reason for her to have a website.

These two facts are a significant contradiction. Leading most logical minds to form one of four conclusions:

(1) The Enquirer was aware of Schmidt's testimony but is far too dishonest to share the truth with the public. Since they have endorsed her as having a "file card memory" any coverage of this revelation by Schmidt would be an embarrassment to the paper.

(2) The Enquirer is simply too lazy to cover the story. They know the truth but no one there has the energy to type up an article and share the truth with the public, instead they are too busy writing about Jean's new $40,000+ SUV.

(3) The Enquirer does not employ anyone that is actually competent enough to read the public record and expose this inconsistency. (I highly doubt this since I've met Jon Craig, he is a good reporter and quite competent.)

(4) Jean Schmidt lied in her sworn testimony and really does have a "file card memory." Which leads us to the rhetorical question of: Is the Enquirer Too Lazy; Too Incompetent; or Too Dishonest to cover this lie?

A link to the entire testimony is here.

Some of the most telling questions and answers include:

Q. Is that a B.S. or a B.A.?
A. I'm not sure. I think it's a B.A., or is it a Bachelor of Science? I don't know. I would have to say I don't know.

Q. And when did you start pursuing, then, the master's of education degree at UC?
A. I'm not sure.
Q. When did you stop attending the classes in pursuit of the master's?
A. I'm not sure.
Q. Do you know what years -- after 1974, do you know what years specifically you attended classes at UC?
A. I'm not sure.
Q. To your knowledge, did you attend any classes after 1986?
A. I'm not sure.

Q. And have you ever received a degree in social studies?
A. I'm not sure.
Q. What classes would you have taken that would make you unsure or make it a possibility that you would have obtained a degree in social studies?
A. I don't know.

Q. You completed some course work in 1986 at UC, is that correct?
A. Yes.
Q. That was in pursuit of the master's degree, is that right?
A. I'm not sure.

Q. Have you ever had a teaching certificate?
A. Yes.
Q. When was that?
A. I'm not sure.
Q. When you completed your course work, then you also had to do certain hours of teaching, isn't that correct?
A. I don't know.

Q. What is your understanding of the certificate that you had?
A. I don't have any understanding of the certificate that I have.

Q. Do you have an understanding as to why you may have a Web site?
A. At this point, I think it's a good question. I don't have an answer why I would have it at this point.

Q. You're paying money to host a Web site, is that right?
A. I guess I am.
Q. So, why are you doing that?
A. I don't know.
Q. Well, if you don't know, ma'am, who would?
A. I don't know.

Q. You don't know who would even know why you would have a Web site?
A. It's a personal question. You know, at this point, I don't know why I would even want a Web site.
Q. So are you saying you're going to take it down?
A. I don't know.
Q. What would you need to know to make that determination?
A. I don't know.
Q. Do you even know what you use the Web site for?
A. I don't use the Web site.

Jean Schmidt’s Vote to BAN GUNS Exposed

Piketon, Ohio

Ohio Second Congressional District independent write-in candidate Nate Noy today continued on the path of his anti-corruption campaign trail by exposing Congresswoman Jean Schmidt as an enemy of the 2nd Amendment. Noy posted his findings on his website www.natenoy.com.

Nate Noy stated: "No true protector of the 2nd Amendment would EVER vote in favor of a GUN BAN. The right to bear arms is a fundamental and Constitutional right of Americans that protects law abiding citizens from criminals. When we take away the right to own a gun we open ourselves up to more criminal acts. Progressive liberals and people like Jean Schmidt seem to miss the point that when you ban guns the crack dealer down the street is NOT going to march down to the local police station and hand his over without a fight. We don't have car jackings or home invasions in places like Adams, Brown or Pike Counties, because if some criminal tries that around here they will get SHOT. Take away our guns and the nation will be a proverbial free-for-all for the criminals and the terrorists."

Noy added: "The fact that Jean Schmidt previously voted to BAN GUNS is my primary concern here. It's already been established that she is a political puppet. In 1991 she thought banning guns was ok. Then she hooked up with other corrupt politicians and decided that she could milk the gun lobby for money and win votes by pretending to defend the 2nd Amendment, this makes me physically ill. What happens if the ACLU or some anti-gun lobby decides to pay her more money for her vote? Or heaven forbid what happens if there is a public backlash against the rights of gun owners because of things like the recent school shootings? If her puppet masters tell her that she'll win votes by banning guns it's pretty obvious she'll flip-flop without a second thought."

Noy also explored an underlying issue to this latest discovery into Schmidt's past: "How ironic is it that Jean's buddy is the one that lobbied Miami Township to overturn this ban? The article clearly implies that Jean pulled some strings to get this ban overturned, to me this is corruption in action."

Noy closed by stating: "Jean Schmidt does not possess her OWN theory on the role of government. Anyone that flip-flops on such a critical issue as the 2nd Amendment can NEVER be trusted by anyone. I vow to NEVER under ANY circumstance vote against the 2nd Amendment. In fact I believe a number of the laws we currently have on the books are unconstitutional and I will work aggressively to have those laws overturned when elected."

For more information regarding Noy’s findings please contact the Nate Noy for Congress Committee campaign headquarters at 513-259-7782 or admin@noyforcongress.com.

-30-

Jean Schmidt's New Ad Campaign "Comical"

Milford, Ohio

Ohio Second Congressional District independent write-in candidate Nate Noy today continued on the path of his anti-corruption campaign trail by offering comments towards Jean Schmidt's new attack advertising campaign that was launched over the weekend and directed at Victoria Wulsin.

Noy stated: "Although I fully agree with Jean Schmidt's assertion that Victoria Wulsin as a progressive liberal would raise taxes if elected, I find it quite comical that Jean Schmidt has the gull the be the one pointing this out to the public. Jean Schmidt was a puppet of Larry Householder and Bob Tax himself when she served as a State Rep for Ohio."

Noy added: "As part of the corrupt Householder-Taft regime Jean Schmidt voted for the one of the highest tax increases in Ohio history. She also cast one of the decisive votes to raise Ohio's gas tax. Not only that, Jean has received generous contributions from the oil lobby. Now SHE is accusing Vic Wulsin of proposing to further raise taxes. Jean Schmidt forever rescinded her right to raise this issue when SHE directly helped destroy Ohio's economy with her previous votes for massive tax hikes."

Noy concluded: "I am the only candidate in this race the voters can trust to NEVER vote for any form of tax increase. I am a Supply Side Economist that prescribes to Reaganomics. I'm the candidate with a BA in Economics and the MBA from The Ohio State University. Jean Schmidt doesn't even know what kind of degree she has if you believe her sworn testimony from April, but I KNOW it's NOT in Econ. Vic Wulsin is a MD, NOT an Economist. Neither of my opponents seem to have a clue regarding the dire ramifications that raising taxes will have on the economy. And for Jean Schmidt to raise this issue is the funniest thing I've heard since the Ohio Elections Commission reprimanded her for lying about her fake college degree in April."


For more information regarding Noy’s findings please contact the Nate Noy for Congress Committee campaign headquarters at 513-259-7782 or admin@noyforcongress.com.

-30-

Victoria Wulsin Added to List of "Debate Dodgers"

Mason, Ohio

Following another highly successful public appearance Wednesday at the Mason Christian Village Candidate's Forum by Ohio Second Congressional District independent write-in candidate Nate Noy and on the heels of endorsements by the America First Party and Ross Perot's Reform Party Nate has announced that Victoria Wulsin is guilty of "the pot calling the kettle black."

Noy stated: "Vic Wulsin's campaign staff invited my communications director and I to her Montgomery Road campaign headquarters last month to discuss the scheduling of debates. However, after seeing me in action in Adams and Warren County and hearing me on the 700 WLW Bill Cunningham show they have decided to back out of their previous commitment."

Noy added: "Our campaign is gaining traction every day. We recently taped an interview with Channel 12, and will soon complete the scheduling of interviews for Channels 19 and 9. But, neither Jean Schmidt nor Vic Wulsin have the guts to appear with me in a debate format. What makes this truly ironic is the fact that Dr. Wulsin made such a big deal about Jean Schmidt being 'afraid' to debate her, now it seems she is guilty of the exact thing she called out Representative Schmidt for."

Noy also included: "My staff and I wanted to bring the seven debates to seven counties as Vic Wulsin had proposed to Jean Schmidt. But, it appears that the Wulsin campaign was hardly sincere in their challenge, in fact her previous challenges appear to be little more than what most would coin to be campaign rhetoric. However, given our recent endorsements from the major third parties and other conservative groups we will continue to get our message out with or without debates, plus we will be on TV right along with both Schmidt and Wulsin."

For more information regarding Noy’s findings please contact the Nate Noy for Congress Committee campaign headquarters at 513-259-7782 or admin@noyforcongress.com.

-30-

Politics Extra: Finney apologizes

Politics Extra: Finney apologizes

The Key Difference Between a Conservative and a Liberal

By Nate Noy


We all make mistakes in life, how we deal with the repercussions of our own actions is a reflection to the world of the strength of our character and morals. This is often the defining line that separates a liberal from a true conservative in our society.

I have observed that most liberals are hatemongers. They throw around accusations and never fess up when they make a mistake (which they often do.) On the flip side when a true conservative makes a mistake they will always say "I screwed up, and I'm sorry."

Case in point, the recent exchange between Chris Finney and David Pepper. Long story short David who is rumored to be a closet homosexual (he has a pink website, is 34 or so years old, has no girlfriend and lives in his parent's basement) and who is heir to a $100 million family fortune printed some derogatory things about Chris in his plan to improve Cincinnati City government. Chris is a well respected attorney in the community and NOT running for office like Mr. Pepper is. Chris is a well known ultra-conservative, a working man and someone that employs a number of people in the community.

Mr. Pepper held a so-called press conference to unveil his "plan" that essentially included calling Chris a crook because he has a business relationship with Mr. Pepper's opponent. I believe around six people attended including one newspaper and one radio reporter. Anyway, Chris was upset and went into a tirade and used a few expletives directed at Mr. Pepper and his female assistant during the conference. The press blew the story up and slanted a story to make Chris look like a world class (insert your own expletive here.)

Yesterday Chris called everyone involved, admitted he'd gone overboard and offered a heartfelt and sincere apology for his actions. That's what a true conservative does!

I don't remember many examples in history of liberals apologizing when they are wrong. Why? Because the mission of the liberal is anarchy. The liberal movement is inherently evil. Its mission is to decay the moral fabric on which our society was built. The founding fathers would likely have considered many of today's liberal movements just short of treason if this were 200 years ago.

Earlier today someone told me: "Nate I can't support you. Your platform is too 1950's." I am fine with that. I have said on numerous occasions that NOT EVERYONE should vote for me. Liberals have no business supporting me.

If you are wondering, I met Chris Finney in August of this year. We have spoken a few times and even though I don't know him very well I can tell you Chris Finney is a great American. I sent him an e-mail asking for advice a few weeks back and he responded that my duty was to:

(1) God
(2) Family
(3) Country

And in that order. I agree with Chris. And can you imagine what our society would look like if we all prescribed to that worldview? Just think about THAT for a minute.

Nate

House Ethics Committee to Investigate Jean Schmidt Next?

Mason, Ohio

"Finally" were the words spoken late yesterday by Ohio Second Congressional District independent write-in candidate Nate Noy on the path of his anti-corruption campaign trail when informed that the US House Ethics Committee had broken its longstanding bipartisan agreement to ignore obvious violations of the US House Code of Ethics by its members.

Noy stated: "When Jean Schmidt was reprimanded for a 'reckless disregard for truth' and making 'false and misleading statements' by the Ohio Elections Commission in April she also violated Rules 1 and 2 of the US House Code of Ethics. I've been sitting back and waiting for the House to finally begin enforcement of these rules once again."

Noy added: "Jean Schmidt was found guilty by the OEC for lying about her fake college degree. Then she tried to cover it up by blaming it on a web developer. Subsequently we uncovered the PROOF that she began this lie when she first ran for office in 1989. The US House Ethics Committee will have little choice now but to take a close look at these indiscretions by Ms. Schmidt. Ironically, if Jean opts to attempt to lie to the Committee she would violate a federal statute that makes lying to the Committee a federal crime and she would face a 5-year federal jail sentence."

Noy who holds a JD also offered a prediction on Ms. Schmidt's likely penalty from the Committee: "I fully expect Jean Schmidt to be expelled from the US House of Representatives. However, this entire process does take a few months. If Jean somehow wins the election in November I expect OH-2 to be holding a special election by January to replace her. Jean could make this easier on everyone by simply completing her current term and dropping out of this race."

In closing Noy added: "The reason I was forced to run as a write-in candidate this time was the State of Ohio ballot laws that were actually found to be Unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court in late August. Even though I am a certified candidate by the FEC and Board of Elections my campaign still faces an uphill battle as a write-in. If Jean somehow wins in November, the public can rest assured that my name will actually appear on the ballot in January when there is a special election to replace Jean after her expulsion from the US House."

For more information regarding Noy’s findings please contact the Nate Noy for Congress Committee campaign headquarters at 513-259-7782 or admin@noyforcongress.com.

-30-

Jean Schmidt caught in another lie, this time on TV!

In case you missed it on www.natenoy.com here is a LINK to Jean Schmidt being exposed for a 16 year-old lie then telling another lie on TV in an attempt to cover it up.

This is the PROOF that she lied in an attempt to pass the blame regarding her FAKE college degree.

Will Jean Schmidt EVER simply take responsibility for her own actions, ask us to forgive her and let us all move on?

I think NOT given her track record of fabrication of the truth and utter dishonesty.

Nate Noy

BREAKING NEWS: Nate Noy Endorsed by America First Party of Ohio

Cincinnati, Ohio

JC Schweingrouber chairperson of the America First Party of Ohio has announced that the executive committee of the Party has voted to endorse Ohio Second Congressional District Independent write-in candidate Nate Noy in his bid for Congress. Schweingrouber stated: "We are glad to endorse Nate Noy for Congress. We will do anything we may be able to do to help this campaign."

Nate Noy had the following to say regarding this endorsement: "I'm very grateful for the endorsement of the America First Party. This endorsement goes a long way in helping explain the mission of my campaign to the public. One of our campaign slogans is "It's about Ohio 2." The slogan could be expanded to say that it's about America. We MUST send conservative leadership to Congress. Jean Schmidt has demonstrated by her previous votes to ban guns and raise taxes that she is a Republican In Name Only or what insiders refer to as a RINO. I AM the only true conservative running in this race and I'm very pleased that the AFP has recognized this and will be lending me their support for the remainder of our campaign."

Noy added: "The fact that this is the second Independent Party to endorse me should send a message to the media and the public. This race has more to offer than D's and R's, especially when the person running as an R is really a RINO. This district is 77% independent voters, a fact the media somehow forgets to mention. These endorsements should also send the clear message that we are a serious factor not to be taken lightly in this race."

For more information regarding the campaign please contact the Noy for Congress Committee main phone line at 513-259-7782 or via e-mail at admin@noyforcongress.com.



-30-

BREAKING NEWS: Nate Noy Endorsed by Ross Perot's Reform Party

Ashland, Ohio

Virginia Brooks chairperson of the Ohio Reform Party (originally founded in 1992 as a branch of the Ross Perot Reform Party) has announced that the Party has endorsed Ohio Second Congressional District Independent write-in candidate Nate Noy in his bid for Congress. Brooks stated: "The Reform Party of Ohio fully supports Nate Noy and his bid for OH-2. Our Party will assist Mr. Noy in his campaign and our resources are at his disposal." Brooks also announced that Noy will be speaking at the Reform Party Convention on October 28 along with Libertarian Candidate for Governor Dr. William Peirce.

Nate Noy had the following to say regarding this endorsement: "I am honored that the Reform Party has voted to endorse my candidacy. They clearly recognize that the people of OH-2 are looking for change. This district deserves honest conservative leadership and Jean Schmidt has proven that she is NOT IT." Noy added: "Vic Wulsin is a nice lady, but this district does NOT want to send a progressive liberal that believes in raising taxes and abortion to Washington. I am the right person to defeat Jean Schmidt in five weeks and I'm happy that the Reform Party has recognized this."

For more information regarding the campaign please contact the Noy for Congress Committee main phone line at 513-259-7782 or via e-mail at admin@noyforcongress.com.



-30-

Nate Noy Exposes more Jean Schmidt Secrets on Cunningham

Goshen, Ohio

Ohio Second Congressional District independent write-in candidate Nate Noy today continued on the path of his anti-corruption campaign trail by commenting about his appearance yesterday on the 700 WLW Bill Cunningham talk radio show and the information he shared regarding Jean Schmidt. Noy stated: "We decided to share some excerpts of sworn testimony Jean Schmidt gave under oath at the Ohio Elections Commission this past April."

Noy shared the following:

Q What kind of college degree do you have?
A. I'm not sure. I think it's a B.A., or is it a Bachelor of Science? I don't know. I would have to say I don't know.

Q. And when did you start pursuing, then, the master's of education degree at UC?
A. I'm not sure.

Q. When did you stop attending the classes in pursuit of the master's?
A. I'm not sure.

Q. To your knowledge, did you attend any classes after 1986?
A. I'm not sure.

Q. Do you have an understanding as to why you may have a Web site?
A. At this point, I think it's a good question. I don't have an answer why I would have it at this point.



Noy added: "This is only the tip if the iceberg. Jean Schmidt has said a number of other things under oath that convey her elitist attitude and that are a reflection of her inability to think for herself. Why do you think this woman continues to refuse to debate? Obviously she is the most incompetent member in the history of Congress and she is lost without her script writers. Debating me and Victoria Wulsin would only further expose the fact that Jean is not the right person to represent OH-2 in Congress."

For more information regarding Noy’s findings please contact the Nate Noy for Congress Committee campaign headquarters at 513-259-7782 or admin@noyforcongress.com.

-30-

Liberal Ohio 2nd Blog claims Vic Wulsin NOT a "Serious" Candidate

By Nate Noy

Chris Baker over at the Ohio 2nd Blog has set parameters regarding what it takes to be a "serious" candidate by his standards.

He had the following to say:

"I’m thinking that a reasonable standard for any candidate to be taken seriously would be to get enough primary votes for your party to be greater than five percent of those who actually voted in the previous general election."

By his own liberal math Chris has invalidated Vic Wulsin as a serious candidate.

Let's look at the facts:

Results from Ohio Secretary of State Website

OH-2 Results from 2004 General:
Portman: 227,102 votes
Sanders: 89,598 votes
Condit: 60 votes
Total: 316,760 votes

OH-2 Results from 2006 D Primary
Wulsin: 10,455 votes


10,455 / 316,760 = 3.30%


Touché Chris.

Nate